September 03, 2005
News | New Orleans Mayor Radio Interview

I realize this story has nothing to do with Bangkok or Asia but having recently witnessed a similiar tragedy it seems to make sense to mention it. Also judging from my web logs 34% of you are readers from America so here goes...
I stopped trusting the American media machine some time in the early 1990's. I don't remember exactly what tipped me off but I think after watching Fox news a few times during the last election, I certainly made the right decision. More than likely everyone filters their news to some extent these days, and the blogosphere has really played a ginormous role in making that possible. Good on that.
Now I'm not American but I think most of us have been glued to CNN the last few days trying to digest what exactly has happened in the southern United States this week. We all knew Katrina was going to be extra brutal but the storm is no longer the story. In fact Katrina didn't even get much airtime on many networks. The sheer amount of blunders that occurred before and after this tragic event played out however, are truly astronomical:
- 48 hours before Katrina hit the order is given to evacuate the city. If your elderly, incapable, poor or you don't have a car, don't look or phone because their isn't a bus coming to pick you up. Get some water wings.
- If you can't get out of the city you should head for the Superdome. Of course there is a good chance the dome will get flooded or lose power. Not to mention the fact that it will not be equipped to handle nearly this many refugees. A one day supply of food, water, and supplies. Medicine? Doctors? Common sense? Nada. The entire Superdome plan although somewhat sound and necessary, had me really questioning in the early hours.
- The way I saw it the media began censoring Katrina almost immediately by actually providing more coverage of the 'stampede incident' in Baghdad than the complete destruction of the gulf coast. Normally reporters are hungry for things like casualty and injury figures which surprisingly were not really mentioned much. At this point I realize things are likely a lot worse than CNN is letting on. The BBC is only a tiny bit more informative.
- Food, water, medicine, professionals and supplies fail to reach the refugee areas (Superdome, Convention Center, hotels, churches etc). To complicate this even further buses do not arrive to evacuate refugees, and are lied to, after it is clear more than just a little chaos is occurring. Picture your dead grandmother in a dark room full of armed rapists with fecies and blood on the walls. People are told they cannot leave the refugee areas, and are in many cases held at gun point. Not surprisingly police actually had to themselves be evacuated from these areas because they were being shot at and attacked.
- The media demonizes New Orleans' poor and mainly black refugees for looting, when many of the images I saw were of mothers grabbing diapers and food. This is not completely the case and it is a bit complicated but again I think the focus on this type of reporting was a really bad idea. I am positive it will come up again in the weeks to follow.
- Washington's first reaction shows GWB ending his vacation early and flying over the destruction in his private jet with that stony stupor that only he can pull off. This kind of made my skin crawl, but the press junket before he flies over New Orleans in a helicopter (this just aired) with his praise and thanks for all the great work being done, was even less inspiring.
I could go on. Now for the reason I made this post. I noticed on CNN tonight a brief mention that the mayor of New Orleans had given a radio interview. In fact it was barely mentioned and didn't even receive an excerpt on the air. WTF? As alarm bells go off a quick Google search reveals that Ray Nagin did in fact give an interview and it was being podcasted like wildfire online. I was asked to host it, so here it is. It is really blunt and to the point about the situation still developing in New Orleans from the only politican who seems to be interested in 'telling it like it is'. It is also very emotional and real and the type of thing I would expect and hope to see on a global news broadcast. It was the real voices and images of the tsunami disaster that brought the aid dollars and got the relief effort moving in Asia. Shame on you CNN.
Lucky for us it's 2005 and we have plenty of options. If you're so inclined I would suggest gathering Katrina relief news from: Drudge, Mathew Gross' blog, or this guy (who is working on the scene and is blogging what he sees).
Ugh this has just been reported on Yahoo. I cannot say I am surprised:
SENATOR: LOUISIANA DEATH TOLL MIGHT TOP 10,000
Posted by Lance Powers at September 3, 2005 01:52 AM
Comments
I see cnn has been playing the mayors interview omitting most of the juicy parts and cuss words. now they are to busy folowing the presd around. By the way I am watching all three main cable news networks and to there credit i have only seen this story on cnn.
Posted by: van_keith at September 3, 2005 07:15 AM
Welcome to corporate American government. We don't just use planned obsolescence for our manufacturing output, we use it on whole communities!
Horrorcane Katrina has generate a stink worse than a run-down sports stadium in the middle of a white Christian fundamentalist man-made natural disaster.
I'm still waiting for some twenty bargain-basement oil-rigs to turn up on eBay.
I wonder if any US officials will be tried for crimes of genocide at the International Criminal Court? Probably not, they were only following orders.
Posted by: Rick Salasar at September 5, 2005 12:42 PM
Actually, the exact opposite of what you think about the media is true. Instead of ignoring the bad news, they tend to focus exclusively on the death and destruction, completely ignoring anything good that may happen. Not that there was much good in this case, but this time around, there wasn't even any talk of the many dramatic and dangerous rescues, and the huge outpouring of help that's coming from across the rest of the country. Despair and finger pointing are all that's making it into the news, mostly because the mainstream media in America hates our current President and does everything in its power to make him look bad. Which, come to think of it, DOES mean you shouldn't trust the media. But, contrary to your experience, virtually every second of news time here in America has focused on Katrina and the aftermath. How sad that Ray Nagin's decision not to get his people out with the city's school busses hasn't rated a mention ...
Posted by: Mark Hunter at September 16, 2005 08:48 PM
Most of the so-called journalists, especially in the USA and UK but far from exclusively in these countries, as well as the so-called "news" outlets are terribly guilty in recent times of several things.
Amongst these are a moral and at time legal failure on their part to do their job properly as well as a car crash mentality that, though loathsome, is perhaps understandable in the general public but inexcusable in people who claim to be professional journalists.
If you add outright corruption by some notable journalists (not necessarily notable for the quality of their writing or reporting), the use of many others as puppets of one vested interest or another (and their allowing themselves to be so used) and the disgusting editorialising that is passed off as journalism all the time now, it's a wonder anybody can figure out what is going on anywhere.
On top of all of that, online sources like blogs (especially when combined with RSS etc) are adding a ridiculous layer of misinformation, disinformation, confusion, political distortion and plain lunacy to what most people are getting in their regular diet of "news".
No doubt, hurricane Katrina was "a wonderful opportunity" for true humanity and heroism to be displayed but the overall disaster was appalling in the scale of unecessary death, suffering, strife, disorganisation, disharmony, in-fighting, inaction, name-calling, irresponsibility and insensitivity.
If America doesn't want a large number of people to hate their president and is tired of everybody criticising him, then perhaps they should take greater pains to avoid having such a large and slow-moving target (of criticism, ok? I dont want to be accused of needing "re-education" in Cuba.) "lead" their nation.
In the world's loudest and most powerful proponent of what it defined (and, until recently, enshrined) as free and democratic government, it is pretty shocking that only just over forty per cent of the electorate could be bothered to use the right for which so many have paid such a great price. The turn-out rate for lower-level elections is traditionally even lower.
And there you have the root of the problem: a nation that has long prided itself (deservedly so) on excellence, gumption, self-empowerement and self-determination has descended into largely a bunch of lazy, whining, irresponsible, ignorant, selfish, poor-me's who would rather blame anybody except themselves for all of their problems.
Of course that is an extremely uncharitable blanket statement and of course there are huge numbers of people who have not, it could be argued, had many of the benefits that someone like myself has enjoyed but, sooner or later, if you don't help yourself, you can't expect anybody to help you.
It is one thing to expect to help the unfortunate few who need it. It is quite another for an entire society to leave all responsibility for thought, decision and action in the hands of their hardly-elected representatives.
The mentality that leads to eligible voters failing to turn out for elections that result in "leaders" like Nagin and Bush is probably the first thing that needs to be blamed.
I marvelled at a short bit of video showing a single military Blackhawk helicopter trying to rescue somebody while some six or more TV news choppers somehow failed to collide with each other in their eagerness to provide the rest of the world with what some cretin of a corporate news whore no doubt reckons is invaluable footage.
Surprisingly (yes, that is more than a hint of sarcasm), I never saw this video repeated. This was perhaps the only news video I did not see shown about two thousand times by BBC World. What a surprise.
To call hurricane Katrina "our tsunami" was ignorant, disingenuous and thoughtless.
Sure, if you discount the fact that there was several days' discrete warning of the storm and decades of scientific and professional alarm about the city's precarious condition.
Sure, if you discount some quarter of a million people from three continents who were wiped off the map by the Asian tsunami.
Sure, if you ignore the countless communities that were erased last December. Nobody knows how many of the uncharted and unregistered smaller tribes were lost.
I wonder how many Americans have considered how the television rescues of the "poverty-stricken" of New Orleans must have looked to the poor people of the rest of the world (or, more precisely, WOULD have looked to many of them if they had TV. Or electricity. Or eyesight.) Many of the victims were quite clearly very obese and were on the roofs of houses most of the world's truly destitute can only dream of occupying, even if it has to be several families per house.
Again, I know this is far from fair to many of the victims of this disaster. However, it is high time America learned how to handle reality as well as learn a little about how the rest of the world lives and the terrible negative effect much of America's way of life has on it.
If nothing else, perhaps Katrina has forced much of America to take note and start doing something about the terrible negative effect America's way of life has just on itself. There is little news in this for people of colour in the USA but maybe now the rest of the great Union will begin to wake up and smell the Starbucks.
Maybe.
Posted by: Rick Salasar at September 19, 2005 05:21 PM


